Talk:Main Page

Now, its come to my attention that we need another admin, so were going to have a vote. For any candidate you want, copy and paste this:
==<Candidate>== ===Support=== ===Oppose=== ===Comments== Happy voting. Ill be back in a few days to see who won. :D - LD760_{{Grovel for mercy}}File:Mr.L.PNG 21:57, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Toys Section

I was thinking that a new section we could add is about toys based on the Banjo-Kazooie section. We could have it split up into areas like plush toys and action figures. If anyone thinks this could be a good idea I will go ahead and begin taking pictures of my own Banjo-Kazooie toys. Or we could just make it Banjo-Kazooie Collectables instead of just toys and have magazine covers, and toys, and posters, players guides, etc. Thanks, Dekudan312 23:24, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

I believe it is a good idea. Although, don't put it at the top and maybe call it Merchndise. Cheers, Chicken7 ^>talk 08:50, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

New Main Page Header

What does anyone think about this as a header?

Welcome to the Banjo-Kazooie Wiki The Banjo-Kazooie Encyclopedia We are currently editing 721 articles dedicated to the File:Banjo-Kazooiemainpage.png Series And you can help

Games In The Series Characters Bosses Enemies Locations

Items and Objects Abilities Transformations and Spells Mini-Games Secrets

Affiliates Categories Wiki Tutorial

Cool. But we still need a nother sysop.- LD760_{{Grovel for mercy}}File:Mr.L.PNG 22:37, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, but to tell the truth, I kind of prefer the one we have now just because it's large, easy to read, and links for beginners are placed right in the path your eyes would likely take. I do think a lot of other wikis actually use the layout you have there, and it does help to save space, but I think the current one is a little more user-friendly. That's just my opinion though. Jimbo-Jambo

Also, Lego, I'm not sure asking the wiki's three active members to vote for each other is really the best idea... I would think that usually admins op people who they've observed to be responsible and such, but it seems like you don't have a lot of time to spend here. I suppose you could just op all three of us. Haha, no though, that'd be a terrible idea. I don't know. Jimbo-Jambo

Yeah I see what you're saying about it's user friendlyness. Oh and I'd say just op either Jimbo Jambo or Chicken because they probably know a lot more about code on a Wiki than I do Dekudan312 23:15, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Actually, now that I think about it, three admins who can't agree on anything is probably a lot better than one admin whose opinion is absolute but shared by absolutely nobody, and I speak from experience there. Checks 'n' balances. Heck, you probably could op us all if you wanted. Jimbo-Jambo

Should i? from wjhat Ive seen, you guy seem like good editors. o: - LD760_{{Grovel for mercy}}File:Mr.L.PNG 21:56, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Well I mean, ideally you'd get a chance to know us all and only op us when things get too hectic for one person to handle (like I'm sure they will when B-T 3 is released and we get a flood of new users), but you yourself don't seem to have a lot of time to spend here, so...I dunno. At the moment there's not a lot of administrative stuff that needs to get done, although it might help to have the rights to screw with the MediaWiki stuff once I figure out what I'm actually doing. Jimbo-Jambo