Be sure to read our policy on citing sources before editing!
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Banjo-Kazooie: Nuts & Bolts"
From Jiggywikki, a Banjo-Kazooie wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
wikia>banjokazooie>Chicken7 (New page: ==Nuts and Bolts== I do believe Banjo-Kazooie: Nuts and Bolts is its real name. Its all over the web in a day and I think I saw someone announce it somehwere. Anyway, I think Rare is not l...) |
wikia>banjokazooie>FerreTrip |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Nuts and Bolts== | ==Nuts and Bolts== | ||
I do believe Banjo-Kazooie: Nuts and Bolts is its real name. Its all over the web in a day and I think I saw someone announce it somehwere. Anyway, I think Rare is not living up to themselves at all with the vehicle crap their doing. Vehicle making might be hard to implement into the game but they don't have to go nearly centering the game around vehicles! Ever since Microsoft took Rare it's all about vehicles; Banjo-Pilot and now Nuts and Bolts. Too much like ''Ratchet and Clank'' I think. Cheers, <tt>[[User:Chicken7|Chicken7]] <small><small><sup>>[[User talk:Chicken7|talk]]</sup></small></small></tt> 08:00, 13 May 2008 (UTC) | I do believe Banjo-Kazooie: Nuts and Bolts is its real name. Its all over the web in a day and I think I saw someone announce it somehwere. Anyway, I think Rare is not living up to themselves at all with the vehicle crap their doing. Vehicle making might be hard to implement into the game but they don't have to go nearly centering the game around vehicles! Ever since Microsoft took Rare it's all about vehicles; Banjo-Pilot and now Nuts and Bolts. Too much like ''Ratchet and Clank'' I think. Cheers, <tt>[[User:Chicken7|Chicken7]] <small><small><sup>>[[User talk:Chicken7|talk]]</sup></small></small></tt> 08:00, 13 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
:(Me and my stepsis LOVE R&C, and I don't think they're TOO vehicle-oriented...) I agree, Rare's not acting like Rare. I think Microsoft wants to Americanize them too much in this case, or at least Rare's trying to compensate for their only 3D console availible to use being an American-oriented one. Either way, this and their statements about making this game different from the last--while a valiant effort, since it's always good to bring something new to the table, as Nintendo proves time and again(barring the Virtual Boy, o' course)--is telling me that they're going to screw this one up. Banjo = 3rd person platformer with maybe a little bit of 1st person thrown in for variety. If they change that formula too much, I doubt things will turn out well. Sadly, many games just don't do well outside their base formula--look at the poor Sonic series and how much folks hate the 3d games(I like them, personally). Banjo might be one of them, as much as I'd hate to say it. Not only would the new gameplay style rub me the wrong way, but trashing one of the more fun aspects of Tooie, the Split Up move, as well as having Bottles' family leave him--not good. That's just simply my opinion, however, so yeah.[[User:FerreTrip|FerreTrip]] 22:51, 13 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:51, May 13, 2008
Nuts and Bolts
I do believe Banjo-Kazooie: Nuts and Bolts is its real name. Its all over the web in a day and I think I saw someone announce it somehwere. Anyway, I think Rare is not living up to themselves at all with the vehicle crap their doing. Vehicle making might be hard to implement into the game but they don't have to go nearly centering the game around vehicles! Ever since Microsoft took Rare it's all about vehicles; Banjo-Pilot and now Nuts and Bolts. Too much like Ratchet and Clank I think. Cheers, Chicken7 >talk 08:00, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- (Me and my stepsis LOVE R&C, and I don't think they're TOO vehicle-oriented...) I agree, Rare's not acting like Rare. I think Microsoft wants to Americanize them too much in this case, or at least Rare's trying to compensate for their only 3D console availible to use being an American-oriented one. Either way, this and their statements about making this game different from the last--while a valiant effort, since it's always good to bring something new to the table, as Nintendo proves time and again(barring the Virtual Boy, o' course)--is telling me that they're going to screw this one up. Banjo = 3rd person platformer with maybe a little bit of 1st person thrown in for variety. If they change that formula too much, I doubt things will turn out well. Sadly, many games just don't do well outside their base formula--look at the poor Sonic series and how much folks hate the 3d games(I like them, personally). Banjo might be one of them, as much as I'd hate to say it. Not only would the new gameplay style rub me the wrong way, but trashing one of the more fun aspects of Tooie, the Split Up move, as well as having Bottles' family leave him--not good. That's just simply my opinion, however, so yeah.FerreTrip 22:51, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
