97
edits
Difference between revisions of "Forum:Editor-in-Chief"
no edit summary
m |
|||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
=== Comments === | === Comments === | ||
Forgot to check in on new votes here. There should be no problems whether or not the person who loses interest in the wiki informs us, we just hold a new election when we notice that inactivity or get informed about their retirement. If we have the position, it can stay vacant but potentially held by a willing person in the future. Anyone elected is asked and can express that they don't want to be EiC, and nothing is then forcibly pushed onto them. Considering that this isn't an overly active wiki, I doubt a lot of work is ahead of an EiC, than they had as an admin. -[[User:Vipz|Vipz]] ([[User talk:Vipz|talk]]) 20:16, May 7, 2022 (UTC) | Forgot to check in on new votes here. There should be no problems whether or not the person who loses interest in the wiki informs us, we just hold a new election when we notice that inactivity or get informed about their retirement. If we have the position, it can stay vacant but potentially held by a willing person in the future. Anyone elected is asked and can express that they don't want to be EiC, and nothing is then forcibly pushed onto them. Considering that this isn't an overly active wiki, I doubt a lot of work is ahead of an EiC, than they had as an admin. -[[User:Vipz|Vipz]] ([[User talk:Vipz|talk]]) 20:16, May 7, 2022 (UTC) | ||
I'll put my vote as '''neutral'''. Other wikis work just fine without a "head of staff", but if that's what people want I won't object. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] 20:57, May 7, 2022 (UTC) | |||