Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Foreign names"

689 bytes added ,  04:56, March 13, 2022
(forgot to sign)
Line 7: Line 7:
:::::No it's more like Rare developed and published it. They were a second party of Nintendo [[User:Results May Vary|Results May Vary]] ([[User talk:Results May Vary|talk]]) 23:05, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
:::::No it's more like Rare developed and published it. They were a second party of Nintendo [[User:Results May Vary|Results May Vary]] ([[User talk:Results May Vary|talk]]) 23:05, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
::::::Right, so it was developed by the Brits. Then there's no reason to prioritize Japanese. --[[User:Raltseye|Raltseye]] ([[User talk:Raltseye|talk]]) 09:59, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
::::::Right, so it was developed by the Brits. Then there's no reason to prioritize Japanese. --[[User:Raltseye|Raltseye]] ([[User talk:Raltseye|talk]]) 09:59, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
== Romanization capitalization/spacing standards? ==
Since existing pages seem to vary on the matter, are there any established standards for whether the rōmaji spelling of a Japanese name should be capitalized word-by-word <small>(excluding particles)</small> or just at the start? And would that vary depending on the subject of the article (character/location/move/etc.)?
And on an only-semi-related note, is there a standard for whether lexical units formed through reduplication should be listed as one or two words? (For instance, 「クルクル」 is written "Kurukuru" on [[Spiral Mountain]]'s page, while 「サビサビ」 is written "Sabi Sabi" on [[Rusty Bucket Bay]]'s.)
111

edits