User talk:Conker's Bad Fur Day

Hi
So, you're new here? I've recently found out how to make empty pages instantly, look at my talk page for example. (Also, Niaga dekcolb, era-uoy? Hmm…)
 * It's easy, create new page with " " (without quotes/&lt;nowiki>) and put in the edit summary "&amp;shy;". I forgot to do the shy thing on my page, though.

sysop
I'll be honest, I haven't been here in about a year, so I don't even remember if I'M a sysop. xD But yeah, I see that you've really been keeping this place alive, so if I am a sysop, I'll look into having you promoted. Regardless, thanks for keeping this place going. =) EmptyStar 15:10, May 7, 2011 (UTC)

Alright
Alright, done. =)

Oi
Where was it decided to restore all of the DKR content? This is a wiki, there should always be discussion about such things before action is taken. Toomai Glittershine eXemplary Logic  The Stats Guy  The Table Designer  The Image Guru      12:01, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * I thought this wiki was inactive so I thought I was in charge... Do you play Donkey Kong or Conker games? Jello Rabbit 12:02, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't see how that's a relevant question, to be honest, since this wiki is only about the BK series. Toomai Glittershine eXemplary Logic  The Stats Guy  The Table Designer  The Image Guru  [[Image:Banjo_icon.png|20px]]  [[Image:Kazooie_icon.png|20px]]  12:06, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * MarioWiki has articles about characters coming from the series like WarioWare and Donkey Kong Country so I thought why can't we have these articles? Jello Rabbit 12:08, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm just saying that this wiki had previously decided to not have such articles, so you should have opened discussion in a forum or something before bringing them back. Now, seeing as the wiki is in a slow phase, I don't think it's as much as a problem at it could have been, and I don't think you should undo what you've done (since it's a good deal of work and clogs the recent changes), but I do think you should make a forum to discuss having articles on characters and such from cameo-only games. Toomai Glittershine eXemplary Logic  The Stats Guy  The Table Designer  The Image Guru  [[Image:Banjo_icon.png|20px]]  [[Image:Kazooie_icon.png|20px]]  12:15, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok. Well I hope I can remember that. Jello Rabbit 12:16, May 10, 2011 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I don't think you know the first thing about being a proper wiki administrator. Just because you happen to be the most active user doesn't mean you're "in charge". You move high-importance pages without discussion, you delete and then undelete an article for absolutely no reason, and you change the block settings of a user that was originally blocked almost a year ago (okay, so that block was going to expire in a month, but I still don't think it was a necessary action). I'm sure you could have done stuff to help the wiki without needing administrator powers. Toomai Glittershine eXemplary Logic  The Stats Guy  The Table Designer  The Image Guru      12:54, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * I am just trying to help the wiki. I just gave the full names for Gruntilda, Mingella, Blobellda, and Brentilda because their last me in Winkybunion. Second, I undelete pages that I kinda think that don't need to be deleted. I deleted images because they were either bad quality, misnamed, and/or duplicate files and unused. Thank you. Jello Rabbit 17:39, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * I’m going to go ahead and re-delete the Diddy Kong Racing characters since it was previously agreed upon here to not include them on the wiki. The Diddy Kong Racing and Diddy Kong Racing DS articles can remain since they have Banjo and Tiptup in them. However, the focus right now should be on writing and improving articles centered around the Banjo-Kazooie series only before we start adding articles about other related games.


 * Furthermore, this isn’t the Mario Wiki, meaning that we do not necessarily follow the same policies that they do. Though most of our policies are generally agreed upon informally in talk pages, it is a good idea to take some time to observe how other users edit and discuss things with them before making such large-scale changes. Don’t hesitate either to start a discussion on any article or user talk page if you find something that should be changed or aren't sure what to do. [[Image:Jarjars.png|30px]] Tycerius (talk) 04:24, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

"Banjogatzooie added too much revisions. Will undelete." is the absolute stupidest reason I have ever heard for the deletion of a page, especially one of the highest-importance ones - what is the point of getting rid of a series of revisions that were done about a year ago? It's not like you're cleaning up the system or anything by doing it; it actually gives the system more to keep track of. I'd like to hear your opinion of why that was necessary (i.e. "necessary", not just "a good idea").

Am I being harsh? Maybe. Do you deserve it? Hard to say, but I think so. This wiki didn't need another admin or another bureaucrat. I come here two or three times a day, revert and block anything that needs such, and go on to do things that currently interest me more. For a wiki in a time of inactivity, it's okay to have fewer admins. Then you showed up, made a bunch of good edits, decided you wanted adminship, somehow got it from someone else, and then did a bunch of things that were undiscussed and unnecessary. You make good edits, but you don't need adminship to do that. Toomai Glittershine eXemplary Logic  The Stats Guy  The Table Designer  The Image Guru      13:15, May 22, 2011 (UTC)